Engineers who embed as deeply as the problem demands.

A senior engineer works alongside your subject-matter experts — remotely, through workshops and working sessions — until we know the work as well as they do. Then we build the AI-powered system around how your people actually operate. Workshop, proof of concept, production — in weeks.

What a forward-deployed engineer actually does.

Most consultancies run a workshop to decide which fraction of your wish list is affordable. We run one to capture the whole thing, then build it. Forward-deployed means embedded in your problem, not in your office: workshops and working sessions are remote, and we go as deep with your experts as it takes to get every detail that matters.

Runs the workshop

A remote working session with the people who do the work, and one rule: describe the system you would have if nobody said no. We map how the work actually happens, then capture every screen, rule and shortcut your team wants. Not the three or four we can afford — all of it. AI-accelerated engineering is what makes that a promise we can keep.

Proves the AI parts

The pieces that depend on AI — summarising, matching, extracting, routing — run as a proof of concept against your real cases and are judged on measured results. The system you asked for isn't up for debate; how each AI piece earns its place is.

Delivers a Living Requirements Document

Requirements as a clickable application, with your data in it, that your users try before anyone commits. It becomes the blueprint for the build — or the baseline you hold every vendor to.

Ships the production system

The winners become AI-powered production systems: integrated around what you own, extended with bespoke modules, or replacing the legacy system outright. On your stack, ours, or Palantir.

From prototype to production

The requirements document that becomes the system.

A Living Requirements Document starts life on day two as a rough prototype in your users' hands. Their comments land on it; by day five the comments are the requirements. In week three it runs against real files as a proof of concept and is judged on measured results. The screens your people shaped are the screens that go live.

Nothing is thrown away between stages. The prototype becomes the POC becomes the production system, which is why a Treefrog build lands in a quarter rather than a year.

And if you end up buying instead? The same document becomes your scorecard →
Living Requirements Document · day 23 users clicking · 3 comments
BordereauxCedantsExceptionsReportsMock data
Bordereaux reviewPrototype v0.1
CedantPeriodPremiumStatus
Atlantic ReOct1.2mReceived
Harbour MGAOct0.8mReceived
Coral UnderwritingOct—Missing
Meridian SyndicateOct2.3mReceived
Bayline MarineOct0.6mReceived
Need variance vs last month — big one for us
Late cedants should jump out. Red, please.
Who checked it? Add a reviewer.
Living Requirements Document · day 52 resolved · 1 new
BordereauxCedantsExceptionsReportsMock data
Bordereaux reviewPrototype v0.3
CedantPremiumvs lastReviewerStatus
Atlantic Re1.2m+4.1%MSReceived
Harbour MGA0.8m−12.6%—Received
Coral Underwriting———Late 3d
Meridian Syndicate2.3m+0.9%MSReceived
Bayline Marine0.6m+3.3%—Received
Need variance vs last month ✓
Late cedants should jump out ✓
Can the −12.6% explain itself?
Proof of concept · week 3Judged on results, not demos
BordereauxCedantsExceptionsReportsReal data
Bordereaux reviewPOC · real October files
CedantLinesAuto-matchedAI note
Atlantic Re1,20497%3 new risks, 1 currency mismatch
Harbour MGA68891%Premium down: 2 policies cancelled
Coral Underwriting41295%Arrived late; format changed
Meridian Syndicate2,01098%Clean
Bayline Marine37794%2 duplicate lines removed
POC scorecardAuto-match precision96%Lines needing review8%Time per bordereau42m → 6mCases tested2,304● Passes the bar. Build it.
Production build · week 8Weekly demo · Thursday 10:00
BordereauxCedantsExceptionsReportsConnected
Bordereaux reviewSSOAudit logDeploy #21 ✓
CedantPremiumvs lastReviewerStatus
Atlantic Re1.21m+4.1%M. SimmonsApproved
Harbour MGA0.79m−12.6%J. TuckerExplained
Coral Underwriting0.44m+1.9%—In review
Meridian Syndicate2.31m+0.9%M. SimmonsApproved
Bayline Marine0.62m+3.3%J. TuckerApproved
● Policy admin● Document store● AI model (private)● Finance GL
Live · week 12Owned by you
BordereauxCedantsExceptionsReportsv1.0 · yours
Bordereaux review · October close11 users online
Bordereaux closed
38 / 38
Avg review time
6 min
Late cedants chased
automatically
Hours spent on bordereaux review, last six months
Coral Underwriting file arrived 06:12 · auto-matched 95% · reviewer assigned

Doing your first AI build in-house?

Guided first builds for teams who want to own it.

AI tools have made it possible for an operations team to build the system they would once have bought. The difference between a build that works and one that quietly becomes the next key-person risk is usually an experienced engineer in the room at the right moments.

Our guided-build engagement puts a forward-deployed engineer alongside your team: architecture and data design up front, review of what your team builds, and the security, testing and hand-over discipline that turns a clever prototype into something the business can rely on.

Read the story behind this: Is Software as a Service Dead? →

Architecture before code

Data model, integrations and AI boundaries designed by someone who has done it before, so your team builds on solid ground.

Review as you go

Weekly reviews of what your team has built: security, performance, maintainability, and the edge cases that bite in production.

Hand-over discipline

Tests, documentation and deployment so the system survives the person who built it.

Questions we get asked

Is the forward-deployed engineer on site?

No. Forward-deployed means embedded in your problem, not your office. Workshops and working sessions run remotely and go as deep with your subject-matter experts as the problem requires.

How quickly will we see something we can click?

A first Living Requirements Document — a working prototype with your data in it — is typically in your users' hands within two to five days of the workshop.

What if the AI part does not work on our data?

That is what the proof of concept is for. The AI pieces are tested against your real cases and judged on measured results before the build commits to them. The system you asked for is built either way; how each AI piece earns its place is tested.

Which platforms do you build on?

Your own stack (Azure, .NET, SQL Server, Python, low-code), Databricks, Palantir Foundry and AIP, Power BI, and our Foundation platform for (re)insurance pricing. The choice is made for the problem.

How long does a full engagement take?

About a quarter from first call to live system: workshop in week one, prototype by week three, proof of concept by week four, production build over the following six to eight weeks.

Can you guide our own team's AI build instead of doing it for us?

Yes. Our guided-build engagement puts a senior engineer alongside your team for architecture, weekly review and hand-over discipline, so a clever prototype becomes a system the business can rely on.

Planning your first AI build?

Thirty minutes with a senior engineer. You leave with a scoped first build and a clear read on build vs buy, whether or not you hire us.

Book a build call